1) "Dianna Cohen: Tough Truths about Plastic Pollution." TED: Ideas worth Spreading. Web. 05 Apr. 2012. <http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/dianna_cohen_tough_truths_about_plastic_pollution.html.>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This video is about plastics. Dianna Cohen chats about how bad plastics really are. She talks about how she is starting to actually melt plastics to form bricks which are actually really strong and is using them in building things. She was really against using plastics and plastic bags. She talks about how we could change this by just using different packaging or bags. They are also going out in the pacific ocean and collecting all the plastics from the ocean and believe it or not, thats where they get the majority of there material. This is bias against plastic polution and only gives her view, however it is very factual. I will use this for mainly the pollution perspective of my project, not as much the polar bear part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) "Earth: The Climate Wars." Top Documentary Films. Web. 05 Apr. 2012. .<http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/earth-the-climate-wars/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although i didnt watch this whole video, i did watch a lot of it. This talks about the global warming crisis and he explores simple yet complex questions about it. Is it real? Are we causing it? How do you prove it? He does all of this in this hour long true documentary about it. He starts in the 1970's and works up to 2000's. He proves all of these points and gives a large amount of information and proof. This is a very good video! He describes how this should really be called, global climate change, instead of just global warming. Its very factual in that it provides different examples. Its not bias, and is strictly factual. It provides facts from both sides of the argument. I will use this strictly for facts presenting my issue and presenting the other side. It will be for the more broad topic.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Kump, L. R. (2011). THE Last Great Global Warming. Scientific American, 305(1), 56
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This whole article is about global warming and how it is affecting the polar bear population. It talks about different scenarios and whats actually happening to them. It opens by talking about how a lot of people come to zoo's to see the polar bears and other exotic creatures and how they werent so exotic and rare at one time. This article is bias against polution for supporting the bears.
I will use this article for my narrow topic which is polar bear population. I was very happy to find such a good article about my topic. I will also use it to describe the different types of polution and how it can effect us all.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Maczulak, Anne E. Pollution: Treating Environmental Toxins. New York: Facts on File, 2010. Print.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This book is all about pollution. It's about treating the environmental toxins, and how we relate to the toxins. Its bias against pollution slightly however it is mainly a very factual book. It states fact after fact after fact and gets actually really boring. I did read alot of this but not the whole thing word for word.
I will use this about the broad topic of pollution. I will use it for factual representation and proof of how humans are effecting pollution directly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5)"Polar Bears Victims of Europe's Pollution." YouTube. YouTube, 06 Mar. 2008. Web. 05 Apr. 2012. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTsmOWb7VwM..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This video talks about how polution isnt only depleting the ozone. Pollution, and other toxic chemicals are being caught in the air steams and taken north. The chemicals then drop out of the air and seep into the ice. Researchers are now testing the chemical content in female polar bears. The chemical levels are so high that they are decreasing their fertility and is in the milk served to the cubs as well. This article is bias against pollution and for saving the polar bear population. I will use this for my whole topic about pollution and polar bears.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6)Pringle, R. M. (2005). Such Low Temperatures in the Arctic Region: How Can the Polar Bears Call It Home?. Science Activities: Classroom Projects And Curriculum Ideas, 41(4), 29-32
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article directly relates to my topic! This was by far the best article I found. It talks about global warming, polution and how it directly correlates with the polar bear population. It talks about there habitat, the ozone layer, their cubs, how they are having to adjust and swim more often. It gives the history and background of the creatures and other creatures being affected by global warming as well.
I will use this article mainly for my narrow topic! Its kinda bias but not really, it just states the facts and gives there sources. This will be my main article I will use for the project.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7)Seuss. The Lorax. New York: Random House, 1971. Print.
8)Sherblom, S. (2007). Global warming in schools: relational approaches to improving school climate. Journal Of Moral Education, 36(2), 251-255. doi:10.1080/03057240701325407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is about teaching children in there schools about global warming and the cost benefit analysis of doing so. They say in this article that teaching children about it will better prepare them for the future world. If they recycle and take care of the earth now this will better there future of the world. Preventing global warming at such an early stage of life benefits everything. This article concentrates more on education and cost more than anything though.
I will use this article in talking about schooling. This will be a good article to use, however it seems to be more bias about teaching global warming in schools to prevent it in the future. If i had to take a guess these people would be against sand mining considering the way the talk about it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9)Spivey, A. (2001). Polution 101. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(12), A578
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is about how some colleges are having to pay fines for there recycling and waste management and things. It gives good information about the current regulations and laws about waste management in schools. However it doesnt talk much about global warming or pollution. It would help most on the broad topic about global warming and polution.
I will definately use this to cover the area about covering rules and reglulations. This doesnt talk about the polarbear population at all but it does cover a lot of the rules and regulations about my topics.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Lorax is a story about the tree loving Lorax and the greedy Onceler. When the Onceler shows up, he notices a forest of truffula trees. He realizes that these natural resources could be profitable by making "THNEEDS" out of them. A thneed is a fine something that all people need. The Onceler, in his greedy state, encounters the Lorax. The Lorax "speaks for the trees because the trees have no tongues". He protests the He called his family one by one and then all of them came and started to help him. They started whacking down trees to make Thneeds, something that everyone needs. These "things" started to sell at an amazing pace and the Onceler was making so much money. Pretty soon, something very terrible happened. In his quest for money he polluted the air, polluted the water, and deforested all the "special trees" from the land. This, in turn drove away the animals that had lived in the area. They had relied on the trees for food and shelter. After the very last truffula tree was chopped, his family left him with no trees and no more money. When The Lorax drifted away from the polluted mess he left a pile of rocks where he stood, with one word ...''Unless''.
This is bias against pollution. I will use this for my broad topic of pollution because it doesnt say anything about longboarding. It describes the difference between needs and wants and how we pollute so much when we cant tell the difference between the two.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment